![]() In fact, this game (along with all Blizzard games) is know to be VERY forgiving on the requirements. You don't need a GTX 690 to play this game. You can't work around 6 years of development. Trust me I'd love to have an nVidia GTX 690 but I don't have the cash. It just doesn't make sense that they would alienate the very playerbase they keep by making their games very broad in graphical experience. 06:18 PMPosted by I understand wow being old but starcraft 2 is not and that game looks pretty incredible. The graphics in it are nearly an order of magnitude smaller than Diablo 3. And on top of that, the chipset was a budget chipset, not top of the line by any means. That may have been when you bought the laptop, but the chipset it is running is much older. I'd really like a workaround if anyone knows of one. Wow on high is less intensive than diablo on the lowest? Something wrong with that. I know its getting up there but that's ridiculous. ![]() 06:13 PMPosted by This laptop is 3years old. Perhaps a workaround or something.ĭiablo 3 was the tipping point for getting the annual pass and now I can't even enjoy it. An explanation beyond 'You're effed' would be nice. ![]() How can this blizz title not support a graphical chipset that is supported by every other game they make? It just doesn't make sense to me. Wow at a med-high and starcraft on low-med. This is a fine argument, except that.why is it suddenly the chipset is unsupported when I can play in the Mop beta, WoW live, Starcraft II just fine.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |